According to the testimony the boy looks guilty. Everybody sounded so positive that I started to get a peculiar feeling about this trial. I think I know him better than anyone here. This is not why we are here, to fight. He was a very old man with a torn jacket and he walked very slowly to the stand. See Jeffrey Abramson, The Jury and Popular Culture, 50 DE PAUL L. Marder, Deliberations and Disclosures: A Study of Post-Verdict Interviews of Jurors, 82 IOWA L. Lugosi, Reflections from Embassy Lakes, Florida: The Effective Teaching of Criminal Law, 48 ST. King, Postconviction Review of Jury Discrimination: Measuring the Effects of Juror Race on Jury Decision, 92 MICH. I mean, nothing is that positive. He was dragging his left leg and trying to hide it because he was ashamed. We should not make it a personal thing. Why Groups Go to Extremes, 110 YALE L. This is one of the reasons we are strong. Stone, Teaching Film at Harvard Law School, 24 LEGAL STUD. Friedman, Symposium, Popular Legal Culture: Law, Lawyers, and Popular Culture, 98 YALE L. See Jeffrey Abramson, The Jury and Popular Culture, 50 DE PAUL L. Why Groups Go to Extremes, 110 YALE L. Everybody sounded so positive that I started to get a peculiar feeling about this trial. I only know as much as you do. This, I have always thought, is a remarkable thing about democracy. No one of them knows everything the others know, or can make all the same inferences that they can draw in concert. Marder, Deliberations and Disclosures: A Study of Post-Verdict Interviews of Jurors, 82 IOWA L. JOHN RAWLS, A THEORY OF JUSTICE 1971 cited in Cass R. Discussion is a way of combining information and enlarging the range of arguments. I mean, to come into court like that. Marder, The Myth of the Nullifying Jury, 93 NW. Copyright c 2007-2008, 2015 by Susumu Hirano. We have nothing to gain or lose by our verdict. Sunstein, Essay, Deliberative Trouble? That we are notified by mail to come down to this place and d ecide on the guilt or innocence of a man we have never heard of before. The benefits from discussion lie in the fact that even representative legislators are limited in knowledge and the ability to reason. We have nothing to gain or lose by our verdict. The benefits from discussion lie in the fact that even representative legislators are limited in knowledge and the ability to reason. Lugosi, Reflections from Embassy Lakes, Florida: The Effective Teaching of Criminal Law, 48 ST. Copyright c 2007-2008, 2015 by Susumu Hirano. Sunstein, Essay, Deliberative Trouble? JOHN RAWLS, A THEORY OF JUSTICE 1971 cited in Cass R. This is a quiet, frightened, insignificant old man who has been nothing all his life, who has never had recognition,. This is one of the reasons we are strong. This, I have always thought, is a remarkable thing about democracy. No one of them knows everything the others know, or can make all the same inferences that they can draw in concert. Stone, Teaching Film at Harvard Law School, 24 LEGAL STUD. We should not make it a personal thing. Marder, The Myth of the Nullifying Jury, 93 NW. This is not why we are here, to fight. He was a very old man with a torn jacket and he walked very slowly to the stand. King, Postconviction Review of Jury Discrimination: Measuring the Effects of Juror Race on Jury Decision, 92 MICH. He was dragging his left leg and trying to hide it because he was ashamed. I mean, nothing is that positive. Discussion is a way of combining information and enlarging the range of arguments. Friedman, Symposium, Popular Legal Culture: Law, Lawyers, and Popular Culture, 98 YALE L. According to the testimony the boy looks guilty. I mean, to come into court like that. That we are notified by mail to come down to this place and d ecide on the guilt or innocence of a man we have never heard of before. I think I know him better than anyone here. I only know as much as you do. This is a quiet, frightened, insignificant old man who has been nothing all his life, who has never had recognition,.。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。